By Betty Freauf
January 23, 2005
[COMMENT: The devastating evil which our government-run education system has become is running under the radar of the parents who send their children into this program of mind-control. Dear God, wake us up!
None of the facts reported below are new. I have been writing about them for over a decade, and others far longer than that. But most of the mindless public goes on and on into the maw of the monster, more interested in the comfort and security of passivity than of freedom. I point you to another article on where we are headed... And another on where we have been... E. Fox]
When I read Heidi Cappadona's article Weeding Out Society's Misfits, I could quickly see where the private sector is now accommodating the New World Order crowd which means that a person who is NOT politically correct will not be able to get work with these huge multinationals which are running the small entrepreneurs out of business.
And the best place to stage a frontal attack was on the public schools where there is a captive audience. Just as air travelers feel secure after they pass through metal detectors, parents of school children, like working parents who feel a similar sense of security when a day care provider is licensed and approved by the state, parents trust the schools. They drop their children off at the front door assuming what is happening behind closed doors is the same type of education they received. WRONG!
While I believe most teachers are well-intentioned and love their students and would not intentionally do them any psychological or emotional harm, the tests they naÔvely administer have strong global undercurrents. The state monitors how each teacher is "teaching to the test" with direct accountability through state assessment outcomes.
You've heard of outcome-based education also known as mastery learning using Pavlov's salivating-dog type training. You've heard about the CIMs (Certificate of Initial Mastery) and the CAMs (Certificate of Advanced Mastery). You've also heard the motto: "Think globally, act locally" but local control is only a facade. These assessments control the individual student and individual teachers by the government in Washington, D.C. Republican President Reagan promised to eliminate the Department of Education created by Democrat President Jimmy Carter but this did not happen. It didn't happen because it's part of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (U.N.E.S.CO) global agenda.
An Oregon representative on the legislative education committee said if schools do poorly on these federal No Child Left Behind mandated assessments, schools will suffer real consequences. If schools don't have assessments, they will lose their federal money. Now, you get the picture. Using the old buck to intimate local districts. He indicated there are some 30,000 test questions in the Oregon Department of Education test bank which no one outside the educational establishment is allowed to see and no elected legislator seems concerned about. These politically correct lickspittles would sooner ignore the problem than stir up a hornet's nest by demanding accountablity.
An educator said in an article in my local fishwrapper (11/9/98) regarding improving scores "The notion of teaching students specifically how to take assessment tests seems certain to spark some criticism but he said kids should learn more under the new system" and then he goes on to say, "This is not about raising test scores but that's certainly an indication." Could this "new system" to which he is referring be "Systems Governance?" Many of Lynn Stuter's articles show the interlocks with Outcome Based Education/Mastery Learning and President Bush's No Child Left Behind legislation.
All the information acquired during these assessments is fed into a data bank and the beast -- the 666 computer- evaluates these outcomes and determines which children have to be recycled until they spit out politically correct answers and the school district will hold the child in school, if possible, as long as it takes.
Of course, we know which children these are, don't we? These are the children of the majority of Americans (Christians) who claim to have a faith in God. They will be the children who live in homes where parents are the decisive shapers of beliefs and morals completely contrary to those of the politically correct crowd and these will usually be established by the time a child starts school.
Heidi referred in her article to Dr. C.M. Pierce of Harvard University who stated in 1973 "Every child in America entering schools at the age of five is mentally ill because he comes to school with certain allegiances toward our founding fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward belief in a supernatural Being, toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity. It's up to you teachers to make all these sick children well by creating the international children of the future."
At the turn of the 20th century, illiteracy had nearly been eliminated and there was no such thing as kindergarten. Children started school at age six. However, today we not only have kindergarten but we have preschool and early childhood development specialists and parents are led to believe the earlier a child gets into school, the brighter he/she will become. The truth is, the more indoctrinated they'll become at an earlier age. Values, attitudes, tolerance and bias that often pit child against parent are the new core curriculum instead of knowledge-based academics as we've known public schools in the past.
And, of course, thirty plus years after that statement by Dr. Pierce, we are brought full circle to the number of articles on NewsWithViews.com regarding the connection between mental health, education and social control. Does your mental health or the health of your child meet global standards? To mention only a few articles on this subject, go to:
[See also Bibliography -- Education section]
Berit Kjos says in an article The U.N. Plan For Your Mental Health in order to develop "the mental health of the population" and to prevent dissent and conflict from blocking progress, everyone must participate in the consensus process. Assessments for all - young and old - will show who might be 'at risk' of not meeting the new mental standards for healthy communities" and as funds are available, every parent will have a social worker who will make home visits, conduct a family assessment and record "risk factors" and that old 666 computer doesn't have a code for "normal." We are all at risk.
As I watched for a few minutes the Inaugural Parade and the protesters along the route, I wondered how many will have their faces enhanced and put in some government file. Was President Bush wanting to prove to the rest of the world what an "open society" we have and was he being brave or arrogant to ride through the crowd in his limousine with bullet proof windows?
In time of war and to honor our military in the Middle East, wouldn't it have been more appropriate to opt for a simple swearing-in ceremony the second time around? In my opinion, at least, his approval rating would have gone higher had he done so. A woman is entitled to a white wedding dress and a big gala affair once but the second time around it should be low key and under current world conditions, President Bush should have been more humble too.
And who will be next for these "assessments?" How about home- schoolers? Michelle Malkin in a January 6, 2004 article HOME-SCHOOLERS vs. BIG BROTHER said, "Last week, a Democrat assemblywoman (Loretta Weinberg) introduced a bill that would impose annual academic testing and annual medical exams on home-schooled students in the Garden State. Never mind a federal law that prohibits states from requiring home-schoolers to take the state assessments designed for public school students. And never mind the fact that no public or private school students are subject to such health regulations" -- at least not yet!
And lest you think because you are no longer in school, you've escaped the net, guess again? White collar professionals as well as blue collar trades are having to take lifelong learning courses in order to retain required yearly annually licenses and as Heidi described in her article, you are now being assessed before being hired for a sales clerk.
The "marriage license" gave the state all the authority it needed to regulate marriage so could a license be far behind to beget and raise children, a la communist China with it's one-only child policy?
The Noah Webster 1828 dictionary's definition of a license is to "grant you a right to do that which is otherwise illegal." One example might be licensing a social worker to take a child from parents for alleged child abuse without due process.
Robert P. George, a guest speaker at Hillsdale College in Michigan spoke about the "Danger of Licenses." He said our founders warned a people given over to license will be incapable of sustaining our republican form of government which requires individual responsibility for the "common good."
No one escapes when freedom fails, the best men rot in filthy jails and those who yelled "appease, appease" are being hung by those they tried to please. No stone is being left unturned. EVERYONE in the work force today is being subtly indoctrinated for New World Order citizenship. Public school facilities will be used to reeducate (indoctrinate) those who fail to secure a job because they failed the apolitically correct psychological test.
And the elderly? Well, my liberal "blue" state of Oregon was the first state to pass euthanasia -- death with dignity laws. Twice we tried to get it repealed. Each time it was voted in again.
I've often felt the 2004 blue-red presidential election color code for the states is wrong. The states that are blue should have been red which in the minds of most people have represented communism in the past. Nicolai Lenin said there is nothing more useful than a useful idiot and while there seems to be many useful idiots in elected positions in all the states, these "blue" states seem to have a greater corner on them.
In the book The Poisoned Stream (c) 1997 by Scott Lively, it says, "The fate of 'sub-humans' herded into Germany's new mercy-killing centers were executed on the strength of a physicians oath that the victim was no use to society." And this pretty much covers "all others."
In the book Globalism: America's Demise (c) 1984 it stated a concept being discussed in the globalist writings with increasing frequency is body farming... "Whenever you have a society practicing 'quality of life', the useless eaters become a prime target for spare body parts; man is just another animal anyway in such a society." Human Resource.
I recently learned of a dead body farm in Knoxville, Tennessee run by the University where dead bodies are studied under a variety of different conditions, primarily, I'm guessing, for forensic purposes. I was told people "donate" their bodies to this "Body Farm" for that purpose.
While we point a finger at the monster called Saddam Hussein, three fingers point back at us. We've become a barbaric society and the politically correct crowd is in control. So, if you think you aren't a "mistfit", think again. While everything I've mentioned in this letter may not be fully implemented, as funds become available, they will be. Count on it!
© 2005 Betty Freauf - All Rights Reserved
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Go to: => TOP Page; => Education Library; => Politics Library; => ROAD MAP