Go to: => TOP Page;   What's New? Page;   ROAD MAP;   Shopping Mall;   Emmaus Ministries Page;   Search Page


The Other Education

by David Brooks

[COMMENT:  This telling article gets only half way to the real issues, which are spiritual, the nature of truth, the relation between truth, logic, and spiritual life on one hand, and feelings, emotions, and self on the other. 

Those two MUST be united, which can happen, I believe, only with the Biblical worldview.  All other worldviews will end up, I think, unable to unite those very difficult categories.  

Given the way he (rightly, I think) describes the "other" education, how can one test for truth, how can one protect oneself or one's loved ones from the charlatan and manipulator and predator in the "other" education? 

That will be impossible if we are not able to unite the two kinds of education so that truth is discernable through both in a mutually cooperative way.  That is what only the Biblical view can do.  Only the Biblical worldview can unite the masculine and the feminine so that they can become "one flesh" without one destroying the other, and hence both -- because they cannot survive without each other. 

See comments below in text.   E. Fox]
 

November 27, 2009   New York Times 

Op-Ed Columnist

Like many of you, I went to elementary school, high school and college. I took such and such classes, earned such and such grades, and amassed such and such degrees.

But on the night of Feb. 2, 1975, I turned on WMMR in Philadelphia and became mesmerized by a concert the radio station was broadcasting. The concert was by a group I’d never heard of — Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band. Thus began a part of my second education.

We don’t usually think of this second education. For reasons having to do with the peculiarities of our civilization, we pay a great deal of attention to our scholastic educations, which are formal and supervised, and we devote much less public thought to our emotional educations, which are unsupervised and haphazard. This is odd, since our emotional educations are much more important to our long-term happiness and the quality of our lives.

[Brooks errs here because he does not see the order of the two kinds of knowing.  The intuitive precedes the intellectual (which does not arrive until about 8 years old).  The intellectual is a way of cross-checking the intuitive, and was never meant (by God) to be a way of life in and of itself (as per Platonism or gnosticism).  The intuitive is an "ontological" way of perceiving, we perceive the basic substances of the cosmos, i.e., persons.  The intellectual way is abstract and therefore only partial.  But it is very helpful in overcoming the built-in biases and emotional traps possible in the intuitive. 

The secular world has no way of adjudicating between the two forms of knowing, no way of uniting them in a common worldview because it has no substantial notion of personhood as fundamental.  So the personal tends to get swallowed up in some form of abstraction, whether pagan or secular.   E. Fox]

In any case, over the next few decades Springsteen would become one of the professors in my second education. In album after album he assigned a new course in my emotional curriculum.

This second education doesn’t work the way the scholastic education works. In a normal schoolroom, information walks through the front door and announces itself by light of day. It’s direct. The teacher describes the material to be covered, and then everybody works through it.

The knowledge transmitted in an emotional education, on the other hand, comes indirectly, seeping through the cracks of the windowpanes, from under the floorboards and through the vents. It’s generally a byproduct of the search for pleasure, and the learning is indirect and unconscious.

[How does one check the truth-value of such an education?  E Fox]

From that first night in the winter of 1975, I wanted the thrill that Springsteen was offering. His manager, Jon Landau, says that each style of music elicits its own set of responses. Rock, when done right, is jolting and exhilarating.

Once I got a taste of that emotional uplift, I was hooked. The uplifting experiences alone were bound to open the mind for learning. 

[Learning what?  How related to truth or to personal relationship?  or to moral value?  or to spiritual value?   E. Fox]

I followed Springsteen into his world. Once again, it wasn’t the explicit characters that mattered most. Springsteen sings about teenage couples out on a desperate lark, workers struggling as the mills close down, and drifters on the wrong side of the law. These stories don’t directly touch my life, and as far as I know he’s never written a song about a middle-age pundit who interviews politicians by day and makes mind-numbingly repetitive school lunches at night.

What mattered most, as with any artist, were the assumptions behind the stories. His tales take place in a distinct universe, a distinct map of reality. In Springsteen’s universe, life’s “losers” always retain their dignity. Their choices have immense moral consequences, and are seen on an epic and anthemic scale.

[The epic and anthemic???  Again, how does one check for truth-value?  Right or wrong?  True or false?

Like the Beetles, they had an enormous emotional seduction, but left the population with no moral or spiritual compass other than self-worship.   It was an attempt to find the "good" without the "right", which, no matter how well intended, leads all too often to narcissism and self-seduction.  (On the "good" and the "right" see The Law & the Grace of God.)  E. Fox]

There are certain prominent neighborhoods on his map — one called defeat, another called exaltation, another called nostalgia. Certain emotional chords — stoicism, for one — are common, while others are absent. “There is no sarcasm in his writing,” Landau says, “and not a lot of irony.”

I find I can’t really describe what this landscape feels like, especially in newspaper prose. But I do believe his narrative tone, the mental map, has worked its way into my head, influencing the way I organize the buzzing confusion of reality, shaping the unconscious categories through which I perceive events. Just as being from New York or rural Georgia gives you a perspective from which to see the world, so spending time in Springsteen’s universe inculcates its own preconscious viewpoint. 

[All this exploration of the "inner self" and of "one's trip" can succeed only if there are objective moral boundaries.  But the "other education" cannot provide them as practiced among us.   E. Fox]

Then there is the man himself. Like other parts of the emotional education, it is hard to bring the knowledge to consciousness, but I do think important lessons are communicated by that embarrassed half-giggle he falls into when talking about himself. I do think a message is conveyed in the way he continually situates himself within a tradition — de-emphasizing his own individual contributions, stressing instead the R&B groups, the gospel and folk singers whose work comes out through him.

I’m not claiming my second education has been exemplary or advanced. I’m describing it because I have only become aware of it retrospectively, and society pays too much attention to the first education and not enough to the second.

[The right place for this integration of intellectual education to be integrated with the personal, the emotive, etc., is in our homes and churches, not at rock concerts.   E. Fox]

In fact, we all gather our own emotional faculty — artists, friends, family and teams. Each refines and develops the inner instrument with a million strings.

Last week, my kids attended their first Springsteen concert in Baltimore. At one point, I looked over at my 15-year-old daughter. She had her hands clapped to her cheeks and a look of slack-jawed, joyous astonishment on her face. She couldn’t believe what she was seeing — 10,000 people in a state of utter abandon, with Springsteen surrendering himself to them in the center of the arena.

[A state of utter, uncritiqued abandonment is a terribly dangerous and vulnerable place to be.  One is at the mercy of those leading the program -- often predators -- like "values clarification" and other manipulative forms of "education".  

This "surrendering of himself to them" will lead in immature hearts and minds, in persons still looking for an identity, to sexual giving of persons to each other.  Sexual self-giving is not capable of leading to honest self-discovery.  You can know who you are only when you get to know God -- in whose Image you are made -- male and female. 

Honest and helpful self-giving MUST have the moral and spiritual boundaries created by Godly parenting, or it will resolve into self-destructive narcissism.  Until we have experienced the self-giving of God to ourselves, and of ourselves back to Him, self-giving will at best be partial, and often self-dissolving.  We will choose people like Springsteen to be God for us.  An idolatry -- which always betrays us into the thing from which we thought it would save us.  This is a pseudo-religio. E. Fox]

It begins again.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Go to: => TOP Page;   Education;   Spiritual Warfare;   Culture War;   ROAD MAP

Date Posted -  11/29/2009   -   Date Last Edited - 09/15/2012