Go to: => TOP Page; What's New? Page; ROAD MAP; Search Page; Emmaus Ministries Page
[COMMENT: Ron Paul is the only candidate who has my nearly unqualified support. My qualification is that I am not convinced that we should abandon Iraq, that the news about the situation is so contradictory, that it is impossible to tell what is happening. So I am agnostic (i.e., confessedly ignorant) on this issue, I do not trust the information we are getting.
But I would vote for him regardless. He is the only
candidate which, in my opinion, understands Biblical government, and that that
kind of government is our only opportunity for honest freedom, honest pluralism,
and a freemarket of ideas as well as trade. And he might be right on Iraq. E. Fox]
The $4.2 million Ron Paul raised two days ago didn't come
"spambots". Real people gave him real money -- and they're planning to do it
again in December. He is a serious presidential contender and the only
candidate in BOTH major parties who really understands the founding
principles of this country:
From: Chuck Baldwin [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:48 AM
Subject: An Appeal To My Fellow Pastors by Chuck Baldwin, November 6, 2007
An Appeal To My Fellow Pastors
By Chuck Baldwin
November 6, 2007
This column is archived at
Recently, Iowa pastors gathered to hear my presentation in Des Moines on
behalf of Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul. After listening to me,
they then heard ten-term Republican Texas Congressman Ron Paul himself.
Consider how Congressman Paul's message impacted Pastor Jim Hartman of the
Assembly of God church in Conrad, Iowa. "I've been supporting Mike Huckabee,
but I would say I'm leaning real strong toward Ron Paul."
Hartman supported President Bush four years ago and explained, "Up until the
last six months I had not allowed myself to imagine that we'd been let down
by Bush." As for Iraq, he said, "I don't think we were prepared to
understand that culture and to work with that culture." He said he now feels
"humble and I feel kind of bad that I haven't done a better job of being
faithful to Ron Paul's kind of integrity." [Source: MSNBC, Oct. 30, 2007]
Integrity: that is the issue drawing millions to Ron Paul, including young
people. The night before I spoke, nearly 700 students gathered at Iowa State
University in Ames to hear Dr. Paul. One of those students wrote me
recently. His name is Nathan Rockman. He wrote, "As a columnist for the Iowa
State Daily here on campus, I have seen first hand what can be described as
Ron Paul fever. Since Dr. Paul visited this past Friday, his message of
freedom and liberty has been spreading through campus like wildfire . . ."
Ron Paul doesn't recruit artisan spin writers and bloggers to wear down
those who might question his past dealings. He doesn't need to. There are no
missing hard-drives, ethics violations, and taxpayer funds used for personal
use that need to be spun away. He still refuses to participate in the
lucrative Congressional pension fund and returns a portion of his
Congressional office budget back to the U.S.
Treasury each year.
This kind of integrity moved Pastor Hartman, the students at Iowa State
University, and many more like them.
Ron Paul has been fighting for the right to life from the beginning of his
public career. Dr. Paul is rock-solid on pro-life. After all, he has helped
over 4,000 women deliver their babies into the world in his obstetrics
practice in Lake Jackson, Texas. He proposed the "Sanctity of Life Act of
2005" (and 2007), which would require that "human life shall be deemed to
exist from conception, without regard to race, sex, age, health, defect, or
condition of dependency." Has he recently discovered these pro-life
convictions? Not at all. Congressman Paul introduced the Human Life
Amendment in Congress in his very first term of Congress, a couple of years
after Roe v. Wade was first handed down.
Is Ron Paul a libertarian, as some use in a throw-away line, often intended
to move the listener to discard him without thought? Yes, on areas of
fiscal, economic and judicial liberty, he is. But, he is also a social
conservative and a Constitutionalist.
Ron Paul's priorities are right with marriage. He and his wife, Carol, have
been married for more than fifty years. He believes marriage should be
between a man and a woman and defends that principle with his vote, where
and when he has the Constitutional authority to do so. For example, Dr. Paul
strongly supports the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Candidly, though, Ron
Paul does not believe (and neither do I) that the U.S. Government needs to
be defining that which God has already defined in His Word.
Where pastors often become confused about Ron Paul is that when he is
resisting the unconstitutional centralization of our federal government, he
is often perceived as being anti-family. Many in these pro-family movements
themselves have been co-opted into believing that the solutions to our
family problems come in the form of more unconstitutional federal
legislation and programs. And when one does not agree with these
unconstitutional remedies, they conclude that he or she is "anti-family."
Such people mean well but are confused.
America would be much better off if we Christian pastors taught the need for
Christ-honoring resistance--at the local level--to anti-family federal
intrusions. We should call on our congregations to vote out of office any
judge who passes rulings designed to pervert the Biblical family. That
doesn't take a Constitutional amendment. It just takes courageous pastors
and people who understand that judges, too, must respect the Constitution
and our Christian heritage.
In fact, adherence to the Constitution protects our freedom of speech and
assembly; our freedom of worship; our right to keep and bear arms; our right
to a trial by jury; the right to be secure in our own homes against police
overreach; our right to witness for Christ in public, as a Christian; the
right to own property; the right to not be deprived of life or property
without due process of law; the right to face our accusers, and the right to
keep government local and limited.
Keeping government local and limited is the cornerstone doctrine of American
government. Ron Paul understands this more than any other candidate running
Most of the problems that we are now dealing with socially, culturally,
financially, etc., stem from America abandoning the basic founding principle
that "the government that governs least governs best."
Accordingly, America's commitment to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness has been (and is being) systematically stripped from us--not by
State legislatures, but mostly by agencies of the federal government.
Consider how it has been federal courts that have banned prayer in school,
and legalized abortion and homosexual marriage. Even in the liberal State of
Massachusetts it was the courts (along with a compliant liberal governor,
Mitt Romney), that forced acceptance of homosexual marriage upon the people.
The solutions to these problems do not reside in more federal legislation.
All that does is strengthen the scope and power of the federal judiciary.
The only ones who have anything to fear from Ron Paul are those who believe
in Big Government.
You see, Ron Paul is actually calling on us pastors and Christians to stop
seeing the federal government as one "in whom we live and move and have our
being." Jesus Christ is our Savior and Lord, not the federal government.
Have we not, in a material way, set up the federal government as our
functional Lord and Savior? When we look to the federal government to solve
our moral and spiritual problems, that is exactly what we are doing.
When it comes to the war in Iraq, I firmly believe that Christian
conservatives have been duped by the neocons. Dr. Paul--an Air Force veteran
and proponent of a strong national defense--opposed the unprovoked and
pre-emptive invasion of Iraq, and rightly so. Time has certainly vindicated
Dr. Paul's principled position. There was a much better way to deal with
Soon after 9/11, Congressman Paul introduced H.R. 3076, the September 11
Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001. According to Paul, "A letter of marque and
reprisal is a constitutional tool specifically designed to give the
president the authority to respond with appropriate force to those non-state
actors who wage war against the United States while limiting his authority
to only those responsible for the atrocities of that day. Such a limited
authorization is consistent with the doctrine of just war and the practical
aim of keeping Americans safe while minimizing the costs in blood and
treasure of waging such an operation."
This is precisely what President Thomas Jefferson did when America's ships
were confronted with Barbary pirates on the high seas.
If the United States government had listened to Ron Paul, we would not have
lost nearly 4,000 American soldiers and Marines, spent over $1 trillion, and
gotten bogged down in an endless civil war from which there is no equitable
extraction. Furthermore, had we listened to Dr.
Paul, Osama bin Laden would no doubt be dead, as would most of his al-Qaeda
operatives, and we would be less vulnerable to future terrorist attacks,
instead of being more vulnerable, which is the case today.
One thing that Pastor Hartman brought up in our meeting in Iowa was the
sentiment of many Christians and pastors to defend Israel. Dr.
Paul stated that he did not believe that we do Israel any favors and we
actually weaken Israel by our constant meddling and intervention. I agree.
Ron Paul is not Israel's enemy. And neither is he the enemy to Christian
liberty and constitutional government.
Ron Paul's non-interventionist and constitutional foreign policy approach
would help, not hurt, Israel to resolve tensions with their neighbors.
Remember, Israel has more nuclear missiles to defend themselves than all of
the Middle East nations combined. Believe me, Israel knows how to defend
itself. And know this: America's constant meddling curses Israel more than
Also consider this: according to published reports such as this one in the
Houston Chronicle [link not available]
, Ron Paul is receiving more donations from military personnel than any
other Presidential candidate in either party. Think seriously about this.
Our active duty and retired military personnel clearly endorse with their
own contributions Ron Paul's non-interventionist position above all others.
In the end, if the candidate is a sincere Christian, he will all the more
readily obey his or her oath to preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution of the United States. After all, does not our Lord tell us that
our yea is to be yea and our nay is to be nay? In other words, genuine
believers are to be true to their word. How, then, could a true Christian
make a promise before God and the American people to preserve, protect, and
defend the U.S. Constitution and then turn around and ignore that promise?
Ron Paul lives his Christian faith and takes his oath to the Constitution
seriously. What more could we ask for in a Presidential candidate?
Every Christian pastor should seriously consider Congressman Ron Paul.
Here is his website: http://ronpaul2008.com
(c) Chuck Baldwin
NOTE TO THE READER:
This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender
includes contact information and a method of removal.
To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
To unsubscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,
reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not
charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intact
and that full credit is given and that Chuck's web site address is included.
Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or
advertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin for
permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an
interview with Chuck should contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
When responding, please include your name, city and state. And, unless
otherwise requested, all respondents will be added to the Chuck Wagon
Please visit Chuck's web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *