Go to: => TOP Page;   ROAD MAP;   Search Page;   What's New? Page;   Emmaus Ministries Page

I have seen the enemy ...
Shameful American Media Bias on Iraq

[COMMENT:  Subversion of truth is a prime sin in the eyes of the Lord.  And should be for His people as well.  For most pagan and secular people, it is the order of the day because radical truth is too painful and unsettling.  Only someone rooted in God can be radically truthful.  The tragedy of Western media is only one example.  The Church itself is horrendously guilty of the same sin.    

Read also, http://www.newswithviews.com/Hughes/sharon38.htm   E. Fox]

----- Original Message -----
From: <frkim@comcast.net>
To: <frkim@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:01 AM

>> It's a shame that the holiday weekend/school break time coincides with so
>> much valuable information that the American public needs to know -- but
>> likely won't see or won't have time to read.  Such is life today in the
>> U.S.  This lengthy and detailed report of biased media reporting from
>> Iraq,
>> written by an embedded reporter, should be noted and shared.  It's also a
>> shame that mainstream media reporting on many situations and issues right
>> here at home take the same approach to "in-country" reporting.
> http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49739
> I have seen the enemy ...
> Posted: April 14, 2006
> 1:00 a.m. Eastern
> By Franklin Raff
> 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
> An Iraqi officer of significant rank approached my translator as I quietly
> took notes near the banks of the Euphrates River, at a combat observation
> post named COP Dunlop. He knew I was an embedded American. He had a sense,
> perhaps, that I was a sympathetic soul, and he wanted to pass along an
> urgent message.
> Franklin Raff
> We shook hands and exchanged pleasantries. I learned he was an educated
> and successful man, an accomplished soldier, and quite knowledgeable about
> the affairs of the world. He had served under Saddam. He openly spoke
> about the likelihood of corruption in the new Iraqi Ministry of Defense.
> We spoke about black-market arms trading, ancient smuggling routes, and
> the problem of porous borders.
> We even discussed personal matters, and the question of his taking a
> second wife. (I told him the one about a thousand pair of panty-hose
> hanging from King Solomon's shower-curtain.) We had a reasonably long and
> genuine conversation about matters of importance to all men. And at a
> certain moment, he grew a little uneasy and blurted out what he had wanted
> to say from the beginning:
> Why do you people not tell our story? Why do you not say what is going on?
> Why do you come to our country and see what is happening, you see the
> schools and the hospitals and you see the markets and you eat with Sunni
> and Shia soldiers - everybody eats together, everybody works together -you
> see that Saddam is gone forever and we are free to speak and complain.
> You see we are working and eating together and fighting together - Sunni
> and Shia - you see what we are building here, you see the votes we make as
> one people. Then you say to the world about a great war and horrible
> things and how we are all killing each other? We are not animals! We are
> Iraqis. Look around you! Look!
> Non-English speaking Iraqis are distressed and disheartened by American
> media bias. Many feel personally offended by what they read in translation
> and hear of in the foreign press. I am not talking about press information
> and public affairs officers. I am not talking about coalition soldiers
> (though every one I spoke with on the subject was equally frustrated.) I
> am talking about Arabic-speaking Iraqis. They see a difference between
> what we're seeing and what we're saying. What does that tell you about the
> extent of our problem?
> I was truly "downrange" in Iraq, embedded in Baghdad, Sadr City, Fallujah,
> and a series of remote combat outposts and forward operations bases in the
> Sunni Triangle. I spent much of my time in areas that were in immediate
> transition or wholly controlled by Iraqi forces. I wanted to get dirty,
> and I wanted to see the worst of it.
> I was entirely too close to a vehicle-borne IED - intended, possibly, to
> destroy my party - which tragically killed a U.S. Marine and a young Iraqi
> boy. I trampled through a mass of depleted uranium, breathed the squalor
> of a Saddam-era slum, slept uneasily through the bursts of an urban
> gunfight, and dined on the partially-cooked head of a sheep. But these are
> not my most disturbing recollections.
> Civil unrest is distasteful and at times gruesome, but in much of the
> Middle East it is an abiding condition. The scenes that flicker in my mind
> seem graver than the filth, disorder, and sorrow that have been a part of
> Iraq's dramatic transition. And now that I have returned to Washington, as
> memories play alongside my daily media intake, they combine to create an
> increasingly gloomy montage.
> It was hilarious at the time. So funny, in fact, I nearly wept. I will
> never forget the sight of my colleague, a well-known, market-leading radio
> reporter feverishly clutching his satellite phone as a Chinook transport
> helicopter flew by, half a mile or so away. He was standing right beside
> me as he dialed through the time zones to go "live from Iraq":
> We're right in the middle of the action! I'm sorry ... I can't hear you!
> There's a Blackhawk landing right behind me! I can't quite describe what's
> going on! This is unbelievable!
> At the time, you see, we were just outside an Embassy chow hall, quietly
> discussing the weather. We had just eaten a magnificent lunch. In this
> combat reporter's trembling right hand was the target of his desperate
> screams, the satellite phone - his listeners' link to the horror and chaos
> of war, the sweat and tears, the booming, blood-shod tragedy of it all.
> And in his left hand - I swear it - a chocolate milkshake.
> There is plenty of bombast in the green zone. "On the scene" excitement
> breeds hyperbole, and many reporters are pretentious and boastful to begin
> with. There's no need to name names: Most folks can smell manure wrapped
> in newsprint, no matter who does the wrapping. But I quietly curse when I
> think of all the self-styled Ernie Pyles in their Baghdad hotel rooms,
> staring out over the city skyline, giving you news "from the front."
> Let me tell you what has become somewhat of a running joke among coalition
> soldiers. It is evening, and a boom is heard in the distance. Some foreign
> fighter has blown himself up, and maybe he's taken one of ours with him.
> Maybe it's an IED. Or it might be an attack on one of our new electrical
> transformers, engineered to dishearten and confuse Iraqi citizens by
> depriving them of a nights' electricity. Nobody knows yet, but that
> doesn't really matter.
> Our journalist, "on the line" in his cushy suite, scrambles to the
> balcony. He sees a puff of dust on the horizon, shivers in the cool night
> air and the intensity of the moment, and turns down CNN on the television.
> He e-mails his editor about these explosive developments and then, with a
> cool beer in hand, begins writing about a great and desperate war.
> Brothers in the crosshairs. A rag-tag insurrection, gaining momentum in
> dramatic increments. A few historical references. A scribbled,
> out-of-context comment overheard in the mess hall. A line or two from some
> radical imam, if a desirable translation can be found. Bingo: It's a
> front-page story.
> Embedded news-gatherers - even those with military experience, as was the
> case with me and my immediate company - are essentially expensive luggage.
> We take up valuable space. We are unarmed, untrained, generally unfit, and
> we tend to get in the way. We are valuable targets for the border-hopping,
> media-crazed murderers who seek instability and chaos. But this isn't what
> irritates our defenders. What bothers them is that when we put pen to
> paper, we tend to stab them squarely in the back by misrepresenting and
> over-dramatizing our experiences. It is no wonder a "PRESS" tag will get
> you a few hairy eyeballs in the field: There's a general consensus that we
> are liars.
> The lies aren't relegated to firsthand reports. I listen to NPR every
> morning. I read the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal,
> and scan any number of online media. As lifelong and moderately
> accomplished student of war history and of the works (and memoranda) of
> men like Sergei Eisenstein and Josef Goebbels, I have been keenly aware of
> an increasing use of elemental propaganda techniques and tactics in
> "mainstream" reporting on the war.
> Good news from Iraq, for instance, is systematically, if delicately,
> prefaced with the indication of a biased source. I am almost certain there
> is a standing order at outfits like NPR's "Morning Edition" to compromise
> positive stories with selections from an arsenal of useful poll numbers.
> For good measure, the stories are often relegated to commentary segments
> of the program, in order to lend a casual and dismissive air to core
> information.
> Let's use, for example, the fact that Sunni, Shia and Kurdish leaders are
> organizing innumerable micro-summits to resolve their tribal differences
> in the name of national unity. Participation is nearly 100 percent,
> negotiations are largely fruitful, and leaders from local imams on up want
> to reiterate to the press, just like our Iraqi officer did, that despite
> isolated attacks and foreign insurgent activity, there is no "civil war"
> going on. So the Pentagon releases selections from this tapestry of
> reassuring stories in the standard manner along with requisite
> sound-bytes, interview opportunities, and raw statistics. The news is
> verifiable, rich in human interest, and undeniably positive. Here's how it
> plays on "Morning Edition":
> The president has admitted he was wrong about WMD, and now, according to
> the White House, Shia and Sunni leaders are evidently trying to work
> together to try and quell the burgeoning civil war. Approval ratings for
> the Bush administration and the war are at an all-time low, so the
> question is: What's behind these last-ditch efforts, and can they possibly
> succeed? Joining me to discuss this is NPR senior news analyst Cokie
> Roberts ...
> In the minds of those who do not recognize the telltale signs of
> subversive delivery, the desired effect is achieved.
> This effect - to convince the world that Iraq is a hopeless and violent
> wasteland, heartbreaking evidence, even, of a trigger-happy cowboy's
> hubris - is compounded and reaffirmed day after day, as biased and
> exaggerated reports reverberate through and within thousands of local and
> syndicated media outlets. As George Orwell explained in his dystopian
> novel "1984," "If all records told the same tale - then the lie passed
> into history and became truth."
> I wanted to confess to my new friend, the Iraqi officer at COP Dunlop,
> that we have an autocracy in America that has never been deposed - an
> imperious corps of convenience-isolationists with short memories and
> powerful imaginations. I wanted to explain that though there are hardly
> any soldiers among them, they rule the thoughts and actions of legions of
> citizens.
> I wanted to tell him about our media elite, about how "if it bleeds, it
> leads," about our 24-hour news cycle, and about the "Journal of Record"
> and its endless struggle to embarrass and discredit our president. I
> wanted to tell him that the same folks who tell us they're giving the
> world "all the news that's fit to print" are the same ones who deep-sixed
> Babi Yar and ignored the Holocaust, the same ones who bury stories about
> Saddam's mass graves and "spike" Iraqi efforts to show us the
> awe-inspiring progress they have made.
> I wanted to acknowledge that too many Americans lack the fortitude and
> patience to stand behind our new Iraqi allies as they forge a new nation.
> I wanted to explain that certain powerful Americans feel we didn't find
> quite enough chemical, nuclear and biological weapons to make our
> multinational effort worthwhile - no matter what we have, in fact, found;
> no matter what the Iraqis witnessed, no matter our soldiers' experiences
> and testimony, no matter Iraq's success thus far.
> I wanted to tell him that not all media people are liars. But I knew that
> my thoughts were too complicated to make it through translation. I knew
> that when I returned to America, the words "civil war" would be plastered
> all over the mainstream media, just as they were when I left. So I held my
> tongue.
> I returned to what I expected. All the hotshot analysts and commentators
> are speculating, with that requisite gravitas, about the "roots" of civil
> war.
> I was there. I was in some miserable places, but I saw a miracle every
> day. I saw a lot of smiles, a lot of hope, and a lot of pride in that
> traumatized country. I saw a remarkably fraternal affection between Iraqi
> and coalition soldiers. I saw bustling markets, busy streets, and peaceful
> demonstrations. I believe I may have witnessed a pivotal time in the
> infancy of a vibrant, freedom-loving ally in the Middle East.
> I did not see a civil war. I did not see the beginnings of a civil war.
> But I did learn a thing or two about the "roots" of this civil war: Iraq's
> civil war has been engineered, in no small part, from the comfort of a
> Baghdad hotel room. It is catalyzed by minor exaggerations, partial facts,
> and propagandistic suppressions. It will escalate, over time and across
> media, as minor mistruths beget outright lies, until the truth itself
> begins to change.
> As our new Iraqi allies become discouraged by what they see in the world
> news, and as they start losing hope, they may abandon their dreams once
> and for all. Our media's dark prophecies will then have fulfilled
> themselves. Then, and tragically, Iraqi and coalition pleas for "truth"
> may finally be silenced.
> Related Offers:
> Don't miss the astonishing expose: "Saddam's Secrets" are finally
> revealed! A "must read."
> Also, be sure to get your copy of "Bomb Iraq," where Rusty Humphries takes
> on the terrorists with this hysterical CD of political parodies.
> And finally, get the book that knocked Hillary off the No. 2 spot on
> Amazon.com: "Beyond Iraq: The Next Move."
> Franklin Raff is senior executive producer at Radio America.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Go to: =>   TOP Page;   Near East;   ROAD MAP